0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
So if Bojo was not at the party or in the building how is he culpable?Especially if he is correct when he says he has been mislead!By the way what is the definition of a Party. I assume there are always half a dozen Met Police officers in 10 Downing Street? Didn't they know anything about it, must have been one hell of a Knees up!
Quote from: Sprotyrover on December 08, 2021, 02:33:04 pmSo if Bojo was not at the party or in the building how is he culpable?Especially if he is correct when he says he has been mislead!By the way what is the definition of a Party. I assume there are always half a dozen Met Police officers in 10 Downing Street? Didn't they know anything about it, must have been one hell of a Knees up!He is culpable because it is his office. His staff. His own personal choices. It is beyond credibility that there was a big Xmas party going on until after midnight, in his office, attended by his staff, and he didn't know about it. Of course there's the question of where he was. If he was in his No10 flat while all this was going on (and there will be an official record of that) there must be some spectacular sound proofing if a party was going on and no-one in his flat heard a dickie bird.Or maybe he was blissfully unaware of the party. In which case, the fact that the staff that he personally chose to work closely with him would organise something so brazenly against the law and keep him completely in the dark raises terrifying questions about trust at the very heart of Government.
So it seems Dominic Cummings is behind the allegation that Johnson hosted a party in his flat in November. That's the allegation Johnson brushed off towards the end of PMQs.Of course the cabinet secretary hasn't been instructed to investigate this event. Or the leaving do, in which Johnson gave a speech, which also broke lockdown rules.Lies tend to come unstuck and this lot seem to be falling apart quite rapidly.
Stratton has resigned. Off to clean toilets somewhere
Here's a thing.If there wasn't an Xmas party, why should Johnson be "furious" about that video? Why should he apologise about "the impression it gave"?If there wasn't a party, that video is meaningless.The video only matters if there WAS a party at which they all knew they were breaking the rules.Trouble with lying is, you'd better be damned f**king good at it to do it without digging a bigger hole. Johnson isn't clever or skillful enough to cover himself.What he's relying on is that enough people don't give a f**k about him lying to them.
The most savage wars are civil wars. My point is that the people who have ruled us for the past 2.5 years are all from a single, tightly connected social group.
I was at a party or three last Christmas, I’m sure a few on here also attended parties/ events and pretended to follow the guidelines but didn’t really cos if no one sees or notices then it doesn’t matter…..