Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 09, 2025, 10:54:19 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Djokovic  (Read 7138 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Colin C No.3

  • Newbie
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #30 on January 07, 2022, 11:12:16 am by Colin C No.3 »
Taking  figures from the governments own websites doesn’t fill me with hope, they are constantly inaccurate and fear inducing for the chaff!

Roll tha sleeves up, get artside and start scoffing this omricon till it’s shat out and flushed away….

Or don’t! ……
Happy New Year Shabby.

However, I see your posts haven’t improved since the ‘Old Year’.

Still full of inane sh**e.




(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Colin C No.3

  • Newbie
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #31 on January 07, 2022, 11:15:55 am by Colin C No.3 »
Apparently he’s asked a female Border Force Officer how many days he was likely to be kept in quarantine & she answered
“15 love”.

sha66y

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #32 on January 07, 2022, 06:19:04 pm by sha66y »
Taking  figures from the governments own websites doesn’t fill me with hope, they are constantly inaccurate and fear inducing for the chaff!

Roll tha sleeves up, get artside and start scoffing this omricon till it’s shat out and flushed away….

Or don’t! ……
Happy New Year Shabby.

However, I see your posts haven’t improved since the ‘Old Year’.

Still full of inane sh**e.


Another year of crazy shit methinks…… hope you and your family have a wonderful new year …..

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #33 on January 10, 2022, 06:09:34 pm by normal rules »
Seems he has shown flagrant disregard for the rules of his home country which can be proven following his positive test in dec.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #34 on January 10, 2022, 06:39:22 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Absolute disgrace isn't it?

Yet another example of the rich and powerful giving the rods to the rest of us.

belton rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2971
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #35 on January 10, 2022, 06:54:12 pm by belton rover »
Arrogance beyond belief.

Nudga

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6704
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #36 on January 10, 2022, 07:15:04 pm by Nudga »
Absolutely no-one authoritative ever once said the vaccine would be 100% effective at anything, but who cares about truth these days?


I knew I'd seen it said somewhere, only from The Pfizer Chief himself.

https://twitter.com/AlbertBourla/status/1377618480527257606?t=FukD1X7WYDU87sRwiXWzOg&s=19

But yeah, truth.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #37 on January 10, 2022, 08:53:17 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Nudga.

If it was 100% effective in a trial, it was 100% effective in a trial. That's just a fact. He wasn't saying anything about it being expected to be 100% effective in all cases.

And what did you want him to say? That it wasn't 100% effective in the trial?

Nudga

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6704
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #38 on January 10, 2022, 09:31:07 pm by Nudga »
But he said it, and you said that no one has ever said that.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #39 on January 10, 2022, 10:30:23 pm by normal rules »
Here’s my take on all this.
The positive test in dec was a fabrication so that he would be clear to travel to Aus. He is not vax and knew it would be a problem. The only way of getting in would be to prove he had recently contracted it. Let’s not forget, this is just a process, wide open to abuse if you have the power and influence he has in Serbia.
It would not be difficult for a person of his standing in a corrupt country to have this done. This is a vax sceptical country. Only 50% are double vax.
What he did not bargain on was the shit storm that would unfold this month.
It’s very telling that his own family shut down when quizzed about him breaking govt law by breaching isolation. Not just once either.
If he did prove pos, why on earth did he show his face in public afterwards.
The whole thing stinks.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #40 on January 10, 2022, 10:39:41 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
But he said it, and you said that no one has ever said that.

He stated a fact relating to a small trial. He didn't claim anything wider than that.

Nudga

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6704
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #41 on January 11, 2022, 07:36:56 am by Nudga »
OK, maybe not anyone authoritive, but she's supposed to be an NHS Dr.
This was on national TV with a huge audience.
If no one authoritive said it, why wasn't this person called out and why wasn't ITV and This Morning called out for lying?

https://twitter.com/thismorning/status/1346038472566571008?t=E_bTHOEKHJ2MJLSnru0ZcQ&s=19

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12431
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #42 on January 11, 2022, 08:22:23 am by DonnyOsmond »
OK, maybe not anyone authoritive, but she's supposed to be an NHS Dr.
This was on national TV with a huge audience.
If no one authoritive said it, why wasn't this person called out and why wasn't ITV and This Morning called out for lying?

https://twitter.com/thismorning/status/1346038472566571008?t=E_bTHOEKHJ2MJLSnru0ZcQ&s=19

No one lied. At that point in time the trials were saying that AstraZeneca was 100% effective at stopping severe hospitalisation and death within the period they'd monitored in the trial, 22 days.

The effects of the vaccine reduce over time and possibly now with a wider dataset the first 22 day figure will have changed somewhat too but overall the vaccine still reduces the severity of the virus.

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #43 on January 11, 2022, 10:14:45 am by ravenrover »
If he had filled in his immigration form correctly none of this would have happened, it appears

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #44 on January 11, 2022, 10:48:46 am by BillyStubbsTears »
There are only two conclusions that can be made in this affair.

1) Djokovic did test +ve on 16 Dec, and knowing this, he appeared in public over the next several days.

2) Djokovic didn't test +ve on 16 Dec. In which case he's just lied through his teeth to get this exemption.

Either way, he's a Kitson.

Colin C No.3

  • Newbie
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #45 on January 11, 2022, 11:30:14 am by Colin C No.3 »
There are only two conclusions that can be made in this affair.

1) Djokovic did test +ve on 16 Dec, and knowing this, he appeared in public over the next several days.

2) Djokovic didn't test +ve on 16 Dec. In which case he's just lied through his teeth to get this exemption.

Either way, he's a Kitson.
Game, set & match.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #46 on January 11, 2022, 12:08:53 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
On top of which, it now looks like he lied on his visa application.

He was asked to confirm that he would not be undertaking any international travel in the 14 days before he flew to Australia. But he flew from Spain to Australia, and less than 14 days before that he was filmed in Belgrade.

He is another perfect example of one of the genuine Elite who think the rules don't apply to them, because they have spent their lives bieng feted as someone above the common herd.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #47 on January 11, 2022, 08:54:13 pm by normal rules »
I can imagine his legal team producing all the necessary “papers” to Aus border force.
All of them still hot out of the printer no doubt.
It’s not like they can do the due diligence in Serbia to check the veracity of such documents is it?

Mind you, his latest issue now seems to be a possible false declaration on his entry form saying he had not been anywhere in the 2 weeks prior to arriving. There are pics of him in Spain in the fortnight before flying to Aus.
Send the kitson home.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2022, 09:11:24 pm by normal rules »

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40563
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #48 on January 11, 2022, 09:51:46 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Two journalists say that the QR code that his legal team flashed as evidence of his positive test was connected with a negative result when they checked it against the Serbian database two days back. Then it suddenly flipped to positive yesterday.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #49 on January 11, 2022, 10:09:42 pm by normal rules »
If it smells like shit and looks like it"…………….

rich1471

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3183
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #50 on January 13, 2022, 06:55:56 am by rich1471 »
Can see him getting on court about to serve and then him getting arrested and deported to make a point on the biggest stage possible

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #51 on January 13, 2022, 01:16:56 pm by normal rules »
I think he should face the baying australians. He is highly likely to receive a hostile reception, which would make good watching, not something associated with Tennis and then arrest after first match.
Deportation would mean a three yr ban from re entering too.
f**k him.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #52 on January 14, 2022, 07:03:42 am by normal rules »
Looks like he is going to be spared the baying crowd. They have cancelled his visa again with deportation now looking certain.
Oh, and don’t come back for 3 years.

ColinDouglasHandshake

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2353
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #53 on January 14, 2022, 10:03:49 am by ColinDouglasHandshake »
I am in the minority but perhaps being a tad naive?

If Djokovic doesn't adhere to the rules of the Australian Government then he should not be allowed in.

I do think the rules of the Aussie Government in the first place are ludicrous, but that is another matter. If the rules are there, Djokovic either adheres to them or doesn't gain entry.

It is worth bearing in mind though that the Aussies have been critical of Djokovic and his 'weird views' about Covid which include him talking about such off the wall ideas like optimal natural health and natural immunity.

God. Weird or what?  ;)

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #54 on January 14, 2022, 10:20:14 am by normal rules »
His problem is the perceived dishonesty around his entry forms, and blatant disregard for covid through his opinion over vaccines and unwillingness to isolate after testing positive ( which is in doubt)

What is now ticking me off, is he is clearly being given preferential treatment because he is world no 1 in tennis.
Any other person subject to migrant law ( cancelled visa) would be held in a detention centre and would go through weeks and weeks of court appeal process.
The courts are bending over backwards to push through whatever decision they come to because he is about to feature in a tennis tournament. This stinks.
Any other person subject to similar deportation proceeding would not be offered this level of discretion. One rule for normal people. Another for the rich and famous.

ColinDouglasHandshake

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2353
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #55 on January 14, 2022, 10:44:26 am by ColinDouglasHandshake »
Yes. I don't know the exact ins and outs of the situation but you make some good points NR and i can see why this would get people's backs up.

Personally i do not have an issue with him testing positive and then still going about his business. I do have an issue with him bothering to test in the first place but again, personal viewpoint.

It does seem though that his high profile is giving him more benefits and leeway than any humble citizen would get.

Colemans Left Hook

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7014
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #56 on January 14, 2022, 11:19:35 am by Colemans Left Hook »
  Perhaps we should rename Djokovic       Djoke-covic


normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #57 on January 14, 2022, 11:35:14 am by normal rules »
The french sports minister has already said he could play at the french open.
I can’t see this going down well in France, given un vax are having heavy restrictions placed on them either .

ColinDouglasHandshake

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2353
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #58 on January 14, 2022, 11:39:25 am by ColinDouglasHandshake »
The most sensible and undiscriminatory thing to do would be to let all tennis players play in any tournament they wish. Vaxxed or unvaxxed.

What a world we live in when people kick off about discrimination due to a midget gem sweet being called a midget gem yet in order to keep their jobs in the health service, people must be vaccinated and nobody seems too bothered.


ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Djokovic
« Reply #59 on January 14, 2022, 12:56:57 pm by ravenrover »
The 1st question that we will never get an answer for is did he realy have convemient Covid in December? My feeling is not.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012