0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Both shitCOYR
Today was our 38th league game this season. Wellens managed the first 19 games, and McSheffrey the last 19 games. 50/50.Wellens 13 pointsMcSheffrey 16 pointsYou could make the argument that given McSheffrey had the January window and has a better squad than Wellens had available for selection, he's had a marginally stronger hand.Either way, they are both pretty much as disappointing as each other. What a mess.
A combined 8 weeks spent hiring them.It really does call into question whether the people who do the hiring actually know what to look for in a manager.How is it possible to spend this much time deliberating something and still make such terrible decisions?
Could be wrong here but when we appointed McSheffrey, who decided to make Sinclair as his number 2, the board or the manager himself. I always thought a manager brought in his own assistant, ie same wavelength, certain stile of play. Just seems they were put together rather than what the manager would have chosen.
Quote from: Lesonthewest on March 13, 2022, 07:41:30 amCould be wrong here but when we appointed McSheffrey, who decided to make Sinclair as his number 2, the board or the manager himself. I always thought a manager brought in his own assistant, ie same wavelength, certain stile of play. Just seems they were put together rather than what the manager would have chosen.They were working together as caretaker and GM wanted to keep him on. It's not been forced on him anyway. On backroom staff i wonder what Lee Carsley's advise to GM has been? Wonder if he has even been to Cantley Park. What a joke of an announcement that was.
Why would Carsley have been to Cantley Park? He has a job, a more important one than anything to do with Rovers, with England.It truly was a pathetic turn of events that whole phone call thing.
The comparison now stands at:Wellens: P 26. W 6 (23.1%), D 5 (19.2%), L 15 (57.7%)McSheffrey: P 20. W 5 (25%), D 1 (5%), L 14 (70%)Most accept that we should have replaced Wellens sooner, yet here we are again.
Quote from: ChrisBx on March 13, 2022, 04:29:15 pmThe comparison now stands at:Wellens: P 26. W 6 (23.1%), D 5 (19.2%), L 15 (57.7%)McSheffrey: P 20. W 5 (25%), D 1 (5%), L 14 (70%)Most accept that we should have replaced Wellens sooner, yet here we are again.Wellens had 2-3 months to prepare for his first game. Mcsheffrey had days and inherited a god awful side with its key players injured. He has improved us but those expecting miracles are delusional it was never going to happen.
After 26.03.22:Wellens: P 26. W 6 (23.1%), D 5 (19.2%), L 15 (57.7%). PPG: 0.88McSheffrey: P 22. W 5 (22.7%), D 2 (9.1%), L 15 (68.2%) PPG: 0.77People claim we have improved under McSheffrey. I'm yet to see any evidence of that.
Quote from: RoversAlias on March 13, 2022, 07:52:34 amWhy would Carsley have been to Cantley Park? He has a job, a more important one than anything to do with Rovers, with England.It truly was a pathetic turn of events that whole phone call thing.He certainly has been to Cantley Park and the FA and Gareth Southgate utilise their contract with DRFC as part of his development too.