0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Unsubstantiatied rumourhttps://twitter.com/d5_rss/status/1544240775311106049?s=21&t=n4D8Un8QvDxOHGgAHHcwMQ
If he has taken out a super injunction to prevent press coverage of his fine, then that is regrettable.The press should be free to report the situation as it stands, without prejudice to any appeal process.This is a very bad move if true, because he will be roasted once the truth emerges.
BST,If you think I take info from a right wing ranter, you are sadly mistaken.Proof...no, but considerable speculation from much more reliable sources than the one you mention.Wait and see, eh!
Tony Diver, the Whitehall editor of the Telegraph, tweeted about this earlier, then deleted the tweet.https://skwawkbox.org/2022/07/05/exclusive-starmer-fails-to-deny-he-has-accepted-fine-but-team-planning-ill-go-if-johnson-goes-line/#commentsIf it is not true, then Labour (and Raynor and Starmer personally) should just say so, on the record.Letting it run on social media seems to me inept, and creating further doubt and confusion.
"Reasonably necessary work". What a load of boll0cks. Different constabulary, different outcomes. Postcode lottery at its best.
You're confusing me with yourself Billy boy. You see, I accept outcomes whether I agree with them or not. Even outrageous ones like Starmer getting off with Beer gate. As far as I'm concerned that's the end of it.
Mr Wiggerly, I accept the decision that it is reasonable and necessary to have alcohol and take-away at work even during a pandemic.Do you?
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on July 08, 2022, 01:24:01 pm"Reasonably necessary work". What a load of boll0cks. Different constabulary, different outcomes. Postcode lottery at its best.Perhaps Johnson should have had his law breaking party’s in Durham lol!