0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So reading the report on the DFP website TB has put in £12.6m and the late DW £12.4m.SM has said that they have put in £25m so........DW passed away 5 years ago, does that mean that TB has only put in £200k in the last 5 years? Either my sums are wrong or we are not being told the whole truth.
Or perhaps the DFP has got it's sums wrong leading to you in turn not getting your sums right.
Replying to NN. The team that were promoted under Rob Jones were paid £7m in wages the last full accounts that were available shows that. The manager that got us relegated was hired by Mr Brunt and Mr Bramall so they must take responsibility for our demise and also the reduction in people coming through the turnstiles.
Quote from: EasyforDennis on February 14, 2023, 10:22:02 amSo reading the report on the DFP website TB has put in £12.6m and the late DW £12.4m.SM has said that they have put in £25m so........DW passed away 5 years ago, does that mean that TB has only put in £200k in the last 5 years? Either my sums are wrong or we are not being told the whole truth.No, you and Steve are getting it wrong by assuming it was DW and only DW. The fact is the Watson family continued to contribute until very recently. When they stepped back they wrote off all the funds they had invested in the club.Some conspiracy hey!
Martin looking at the full accounts ending 2012/2013 the wages shows the £7m figure that the season we were promoted back to the Championship from league 1.
Quote from: silent majority on February 14, 2023, 11:10:13 amQuote from: EasyforDennis on February 14, 2023, 10:22:02 amSo reading the report on the DFP website TB has put in £12.6m and the late DW £12.4m.SM has said that they have put in £25m so........DW passed away 5 years ago, does that mean that TB has only put in £200k in the last 5 years? Either my sums are wrong or we are not being told the whole truth.No, you and Steve are getting it wrong by assuming it was DW and only DW. The fact is the Watson family continued to contribute until very recently. When they stepped back they wrote off all the funds they had invested in the club.Some conspiracy hey!No conspiracy but in last nights meeting TB linked £25m with a league 2 club which is wrong as the Watson family have not been contributing in the period of league 1 relegation or league 2 present time.
Quote from: steve@dcfd on February 14, 2023, 11:33:13 amQuote from: silent majority on February 14, 2023, 11:10:13 amQuote from: EasyforDennis on February 14, 2023, 10:22:02 amSo reading the report on the DFP website TB has put in £12.6m and the late DW £12.4m.SM has said that they have put in £25m so........DW passed away 5 years ago, does that mean that TB has only put in £200k in the last 5 years? Either my sums are wrong or we are not being told the whole truth.No, you and Steve are getting it wrong by assuming it was DW and only DW. The fact is the Watson family continued to contribute until very recently. When they stepped back they wrote off all the funds they had invested in the club.Some conspiracy hey!No conspiracy but in last nights meeting TB linked £25m with a league 2 club which is wrong as the Watson family have not been contributing in the period of league 1 relegation or league 2 present time.I'm struggling here, what is the actual point you're making?Surely, we're a LG2 club that has had millions invested in it in recent years. Isn't that the point he made?
Yes TB said he’d put £12.6m into the club a total of £25m with DW and family and we are a league 2. But the money he’s put in was spread over a period of at least 14 years in the Championship, League 1 and League 2. So the point I was making the £25m was not just as a league 2 club.
Quote from: silent majority on February 14, 2023, 11:10:13 amQuote from: EasyforDennis on February 14, 2023, 10:22:02 amSo reading the report on the DFP website TB has put in £12.6m and the late DW £12.4m.SM has said that they have put in £25m so........DW passed away 5 years ago, does that mean that TB has only put in £200k in the last 5 years? Either my sums are wrong or we are not being told the whole truth.No, you and Steve are getting it wrong by assuming it was DW and only DW. The fact is the Watson family continued to contribute until very recently. When they stepped back they wrote off all the funds they had invested in the club.Some conspiracy hey!I know the Watson family wrote off all the funds they had invested in the club but how does that equate to the Watson family and TB both contributing almost equal amounts when the family stood back some years ago.
So I couldn't make the meeting this am relying on the bits I've seen written.Was the feeling one of the owners wanting to just carry on as we are or is there an acceptance that things haven't been going well?
Quote from: steve@dcfd on February 14, 2023, 11:29:45 amMartin looking at the full accounts ending 2012/2013 the wages shows the £7m figure that the season we were promoted back to the Championship from league 1.This is absolutely correct. For the season 2012/13 total staff costs (playing and non playing, wages, taxes and pension contributions) amounted to £7.05m. Worth also balancing that for this season, we made a huge pre-tax loss of £4.38m. Which means very broadly speaking and in simplistic terms that our actual ‘sustainable’ wage bill was around £2.75m that season and our owners basically paid the rest themselves in order to get us promoted.
Apparently, according to Mr Blunt, if we increase the crowd by 50%, we would be sustainable. No acknowledgement that they’re driving supporters away with this frugal approach. Gavin made it perfectly clear that we need to be out of league 2, meaning back in league 1. However, with the quality/standard of player dropping, due to affordability, how do they think we’re going to get out this league without more investment?
SM why get involved with the toing and frowing with people with questions for the owners who couldn't even be bothered to turn up to a meeting that they could have asked their questions at freely, and got their answers, and now want to take issue with someone who has put at least £12.5 million into the club on how much and how he spends his money. They want to think themselves lucky the owners gave the answers they did, the way they did, a lot would have been a lot blunter with their replies.
Quote from: selby on February 14, 2023, 01:28:53 pm SM why get involved with the toing and frowing with people with questions for the owners who couldn't even be bothered to turn up to a meeting that they could have asked their questions at freely, and got their answers, and now want to take issue with someone who has put at least £12.5 million into the club on how much and how he spends his money. They want to think themselves lucky the owners gave the answers they did, the way they did, a lot would have been a lot blunter with their replies. Why does not going to a hastily arranged event on a Monday night preclude you from being involved in the discussion or asking questions?Not everybody is able to do these things on a whim - some people have jobs, families to look after, and some live considerable distances from Doncaster. I didn't go last night because it would've meant a 100+ mile round trip to the ground - a trip which I am going to be making tonight for the match, and doing it twice in as many days I couldn't justify.