Lee Anderson….

[Filo]

….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!

[Mike_F]

A thoroughly unpleasant individual in a thoroughly unpleasant party. They deserve one another.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Aye. The party of thick racists adds another thick racist to its ranks.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Give Anderson 18 months, he'll be in the Revolutionary Communist Party, and he'll nearly have finished his first political circumnavigation.

[Mike_F]

I wish someone would give him a political circumcision so the world can clearly see him for the bell end he is.

[Pancho Regan]

….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!

That made me laugh Filo!

This guy Anderson really is a joke. You would imagine Rishi will be relieved he's quit the Tory Party.

[albie]

It will be a marriage made in heaven, if this is owt to go by;
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/all-the-times-lee-anderson-talked-smack-about-reform-uk-370147/

[BillyStubbsTears]

Lee Anderson?

Lee Anderson?

I wonder if he's related to the Lee Anderson who voted in favour of a Bill that would have made it mandatory to hold a by-election when an MP switched parties.

Surely not! This Lee Anderson wouldn't be a hypocritucal Kitson like that, would he?

[ravenrover]

….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!

That made me laugh Filo!

This guy Anderson really is a joke. You would imagine Rishi will be relieved he's quit the Tory Party.

Why would Rich-ie be relieved he's gone, LeeAndertal was the mouthy mouthpiece for what some of the Tory MPs were afraid to say in public but thought behind closed doors.

[tommy toes]

Nick Fletcher will be upset. He's his great friend, "An honest man and not a racist."
What's the betting Fletcher defects to Reform when he's kicked out of Donny soon.

[MachoMadness]

….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!

That made me laugh Filo!

This guy Anderson really is a joke. You would imagine Rishi will be relieved he's quit the Tory Party.

Why would Rich-ie be relieved he's gone, LeeAndertal was the mouthy mouthpiece for what some of the Tory MPs were afraid to say in public but thought behind closed doors.

That's probably why they wanted rid. He's thick enough to say the things out loud that most of them think, but are clever enough to imply or dance around.

You'd be surprised what you can get away with when you dress it up as "reasonable concerns" - 30p Lee ruins the game for them.

[selby]

  Labour would do well to take the Reform Party seriously, they will attract voters from their numbers as well as the Tories, who have not got the Islamic vote problem if the Gaza situation carries on, which it is likely to do and force parties to take sides, and is a problem for Labour and their official stance.
  The problem is already slipping as news worthy, the same as the Ukraine unless you watch Al Jazeera and the weekly disruption of the marches like the stop oil campaign will divide opinion that will be exploited by the parties  leading up to the election.
  They are a new party without the history of past failures in office Labour and The Tories have, and can put a manifesto forward to attract voters without the constraints of past policy, and the jousting that has gone on with the two parties publicly and statements that limit what their manifesto will contain.
   Costs of transport, running a home and green energy being foisted on the electorate, higher council tax's are all the result of the two main parties that they can beat them over their heads with, and little come back on them at all. and a electorate who are bored and pig sick of the same faces talking bull s**t every day on TV while things turn worse.
  Time for a big change of scenery.

[wilts rover]

A top Tory close to No 10 has told parliamentary colleagues that Rishi Sunak will call an election if 10 Tory MPs defect to Reform UK

https://twitter.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1767271717884358999

Come on boys/girls - do it for the country.

[Glyn_Wigley]

  Labour would do well to take the Reform Party seriously, they will attract voters from their numbers as well as the Tories, who have not got the Islamic vote problem if the Gaza situation carries on, which it is likely to do and force parties to take sides, and is a problem for Labour and their official stance.
  The problem is already slipping as news worthy, the same as the Ukraine unless you watch Al Jazeera and the weekly disruption of the marches like the stop oil campaign will divide opinion that will be exploited by the parties  leading up to the election.
  They are a new party without the history of past failures in office Labour and The Tories have, and can put a manifesto forward to attract voters without the constraints of past policy, and the jousting that has gone on with the two parties publicly and statements that limit what their manifesto will contain.
   Costs of transport, running a home and green energy being foisted on the electorate, higher council tax's are all the result of the two main parties that they can beat them over their heads with, and little come back on them at all. and a electorate who are bored and pig sick of the same faces talking bull s**t every day on TV while things turn worse.
  Time for a big change of scenery.

Aye, their performance in Rochdale must have every other party shitting themselves.

[selby]

One man P*ssed on all the parties including labour  mustering support from the Islamic community and making just one subject the focal point of all debate.
  I suppose you will point to the fact when the poo hit the fan labour ran away and are in denial saving face, but gorgeous George ran rings around the whole lot and should frighten you opening up other possibilities.
  Glyn just keep your head in the sand and your backside sunny side up, the world will carry on.

[idler]

George Galloway is just a one man self-promoting machine. He is more interested in himself than any constituent that he represents. He might have had more gravitas if he had gone to a Middle East hot spot rather than the Big Brother house. He just wants a platform to promote himself as much as possible. We saw first hand what he was like in his cameo appearance in Bradford.

[ravenrover]

Selby, let's see what happens at the GE re Rochdale

[Glyn_Wigley]

One man P*ssed on all the parties including labour  mustering support from the Islamic community and making just one subject the focal point of all debate.
  I suppose you will point to the fact when the poo hit the fan labour ran away and are in denial saving face, but gorgeous George ran rings around the whole lot and should frighten you opening up other possibilities.
  Glyn just keep your head in the sand and your backside sunny side up, the world will carry on.

So Reform did really well in Rochdale then? Surely they must have done after Labour left the fight and the Tories as popular as rabies there'd have been loads of votes for them to have scooped up without even trying.

[selby]

  For the second time gorgeous George has promoted an electoral win on racial issues, and encouraged an Islamic vote against the established political parties.
  The first time it was fleeting and was overturned at a general election by Labour tapping into the same sort of narrative and promoting their stance as supporting the same people.
  The problem Labour now have they have been seen as antisemitic but have denied it on many occasions so what type rope are they going to walk in the next election especially if Gaza is still a subject and the Islamic vote is easily corralled into one subject voting.
  The first time GG worked the system was looked on as a bit of a fluke, this time it wasn't, and he cashed in in a very short time knew he would do it, and shows that that certain religion has more pulling power than any political party in this country to its believers.
  The Tories, Labour, and other political parties have supporters that will at least listen and judge their support on what the parties propose and most will have voted for more than just one party in their lifetime as their circumstances change and their view of the world.
  Islamists  have a herd mentality and don't vier from their leaders doctrines and will follow without question, and their leaders will use labour but their ambition is to gain control themselves.
  The minute they think Labour have used up their usefulness they will form their own party with a guaranteed following.

[SydneyRover]

You didn't learn anything from the London topic then selby?

[selby]

  Your sick, go to the doctors, give the wife if she is still about a break.

[SydneyRover]

I thought you post was a wind up selby, so I treated it that way is all

[Glyn_Wigley]

  For the second time gorgeous George has promoted an electoral win on racial issues, and encouraged an Islamic vote against the established political parties.
  The first time it was fleeting and was overturned at a general election by Labour tapping into the same sort of narrative and promoting their stance as supporting the same people.
  The problem Labour now have they have been seen as antisemitic but have denied it on many occasions so what type rope are they going to walk in the next election especially if Gaza is still a subject and the Islamic vote is easily corralled into one subject voting.
  The first time GG worked the system was looked on as a bit of a fluke, this time it wasn't, and he cashed in in a very short time knew he would do it, and shows that that certain religion has more pulling power than any political party in this country to its believers.
  The Tories, Labour, and other political parties have supporters that will at least listen and judge their support on what the parties propose and most will have voted for more than just one party in their lifetime as their circumstances change and their view of the world.
  Islamists  have a herd mentality and don't vier from their leaders doctrines and will follow without question, and their leaders will use labour but their ambition is to gain control themselves.
  The minute they think Labour have used up their usefulness they will form their own party with a guaranteed following.

You keep saying this, and it's got a lot of truth to it. But you waded into this thread saying Labour should be worried about Reform. Yet you keep on ignoring the fact that despite all the problems Labour had in Rochdale Reform managed to do f**k all. Why should Labour be worried about a party that can't even manage to pick up ANY Labour votes in an election where Labour was in the shit?

[DonnyOsmond]

  Labour would do well to take the Reform Party seriously, they will attract voters from their numbers as well as the Tories, who have not got the Islamic vote problem if the Gaza situation carries on, which it is likely to do and force parties to take sides, and is a problem for Labour and their official stance.
  The problem is already slipping as news worthy, the same as the Ukraine unless you watch Al Jazeera and the weekly disruption of the marches like the stop oil campaign will divide opinion that will be exploited by the parties  leading up to the election.
  They are a new party without the history of past failures in office Labour and The Tories have, and can put a manifesto forward to attract voters without the constraints of past policy, and the jousting that has gone on with the two parties publicly and statements that limit what their manifesto will contain.
   Costs of transport, running a home and green energy being foisted on the electorate, higher council tax's are all the result of the two main parties that they can beat them over their heads with, and little come back on them at all. and a electorate who are bored and pig sick of the same faces talking bull s**t every day on TV while things turn worse.
  Time for a big change of scenery.

They're not new. They're the Brexit Party, they were around at the last election.

Surely they're on likely to attract the viewers of GB News?

[SydneyRover]

  For the second time gorgeous George has promoted an electoral win on racial issues, and encouraged an Islamic vote against the established political parties.
  The first time it was fleeting and was overturned at a general election by Labour tapping into the same sort of narrative and promoting their stance as supporting the same people.
  The problem Labour now have they have been seen as antisemitic but have denied it on many occasions so what type rope are they going to walk in the next election especially if Gaza is still a subject and the Islamic vote is easily corralled into one subject voting.
  The first time GG worked the system was looked on as a bit of a fluke, this time it wasn't, and he cashed in in a very short time knew he would do it, and shows that that certain religion has more pulling power than any political party in this country to its believers.
  The Tories, Labour, and other political parties have supporters that will at least listen and judge their support on what the parties propose and most will have voted for more than just one party in their lifetime as their circumstances change and their view of the world.
  Islamists  have a herd mentality and don't vier from their leaders doctrines and will follow without question, and their leaders will use labour but their ambition is to gain control themselves.
  The minute they think Labour have used up their usefulness they will form their own party with a guaranteed following.

Who are these people, what is your understanding of them selby?

[selby]

   More to the point do you think the Labour Party will regain the Islamic vote in Rochdale and the wider country?

[SydneyRover]

Selby: ''Islamists  have a herd mentality and don't vier from their leaders doctrines and will follow without question, and their leaders will use labour but their ambition is to gain control themselves''

''The minute they think Labour have used up their usefulness they will form their own party with a guaranteed following''

Me: ''Who are these people, what is your understanding of them selby?''

Selby: ''More to the point do you think the Labour Party will regain the Islamic vote in Rochdale and the wider country?''

Do Islamists all think the same, as your posts suggests? Do they all wear the same socks? is there some point to you saying that they have a herd mentality when you clearly haven't any clue about them whatsoever selby.

[Colemans Left Hook]

A thoroughly unpleasant individual in a thoroughly unpleasant party. They deserve one another.

I thought BST had the copyright on the word "unpleasant" or has it run out like Boris did ?

[Colemans Left Hook]

A thoroughly unpleasant individual in a thoroughly unpleasant party. They deserve one another.

I thought BST had the copyright on the word "unpleasant" or has it run out like Boris did ?

Apologies BST for getting you out of bed at 1-33 am to read my post about you

back to bed  quickly I see !!

by chance   ,,, I christened you about 10 minutes ago as "the Official Gatekeeper of the OFF Topic Section"

it's a dangerous world at the moment on here  we have Bentley Bullet with his Guillotine Blade on the loose at the moment

[BillyStubbsTears]

https://x.com/Sillytees/status/1769000004604063983?s=20

Coming out in their droves to see Leanderthal.

Is it that even Reform supporters are embarrassed by him? Or do they never leave the house?