0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!
Quote from: Filo on March 11, 2024, 11:17:12 am….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!That made me laugh Filo!This guy Anderson really is a joke. You would imagine Rishi will be relieved he's quit the Tory Party.
Quote from: Pancho Regan on March 11, 2024, 03:41:34 pmQuote from: Filo on March 11, 2024, 11:17:12 am….has had more Parties than Boris Johnson!That made me laugh Filo!This guy Anderson really is a joke. You would imagine Rishi will be relieved he's quit the Tory Party.Why would Rich-ie be relieved he's gone, LeeAndertal was the mouthy mouthpiece for what some of the Tory MPs were afraid to say in public but thought behind closed doors.
Labour would do well to take the Reform Party seriously, they will attract voters from their numbers as well as the Tories, who have not got the Islamic vote problem if the Gaza situation carries on, which it is likely to do and force parties to take sides, and is a problem for Labour and their official stance. The problem is already slipping as news worthy, the same as the Ukraine unless you watch Al Jazeera and the weekly disruption of the marches like the stop oil campaign will divide opinion that will be exploited by the parties leading up to the election. They are a new party without the history of past failures in office Labour and The Tories have, and can put a manifesto forward to attract voters without the constraints of past policy, and the jousting that has gone on with the two parties publicly and statements that limit what their manifesto will contain. Costs of transport, running a home and green energy being foisted on the electorate, higher council tax's are all the result of the two main parties that they can beat them over their heads with, and little come back on them at all. and a electorate who are bored and pig sick of the same faces talking bull s**t every day on TV while things turn worse. Time for a big change of scenery.
One man P*ssed on all the parties including labour mustering support from the Islamic community and making just one subject the focal point of all debate. I suppose you will point to the fact when the poo hit the fan labour ran away and are in denial saving face, but gorgeous George ran rings around the whole lot and should frighten you opening up other possibilities. Glyn just keep your head in the sand and your backside sunny side up, the world will carry on.
For the second time gorgeous George has promoted an electoral win on racial issues, and encouraged an Islamic vote against the established political parties. The first time it was fleeting and was overturned at a general election by Labour tapping into the same sort of narrative and promoting their stance as supporting the same people. The problem Labour now have they have been seen as antisemitic but have denied it on many occasions so what type rope are they going to walk in the next election especially if Gaza is still a subject and the Islamic vote is easily corralled into one subject voting. The first time GG worked the system was looked on as a bit of a fluke, this time it wasn't, and he cashed in in a very short time knew he would do it, and shows that that certain religion has more pulling power than any political party in this country to its believers. The Tories, Labour, and other political parties have supporters that will at least listen and judge their support on what the parties propose and most will have voted for more than just one party in their lifetime as their circumstances change and their view of the world. Islamists have a herd mentality and don't vier from their leaders doctrines and will follow without question, and their leaders will use labour but their ambition is to gain control themselves. The minute they think Labour have used up their usefulness they will form their own party with a guaranteed following.
A thoroughly unpleasant individual in a thoroughly unpleasant party. They deserve one another.
Quote from: Mike_F on March 11, 2024, 11:25:06 amA thoroughly unpleasant individual in a thoroughly unpleasant party. They deserve one another.I thought BST had the copyright on the word "unpleasant" or has it run out like Boris did ?