0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I would think its to do with funding. I think the odd rumour about the operator really is just that, everything ive read it seems as if basically the the T's being crossed and I's being dotted. Its a bit more than buying a house and renting it out
Quote from: Dagenham Rover on January 22, 2025, 11:31:54 amI would think its to do with funding. I think the odd rumour about the operator really is just that, everything ive read it seems as if basically the the T's being crossed and I's being dotted. Its a bit more than buying a house and renting it out Yeah definitely, that's what I thought. Really want this to happen for our City. Their is a guy on the Skyscraper City website on the DSA forum called Pug, who claims to know a bit about the aviation industry. And said it was a red flag there is no mention of the operator on the Fly Doncaster Ltd application, not in regards to a name but a reference to there being another party involved. Fingers crossed for good news soon.
I don't think the article is quite right and no doubt the authorities will comment at some point.Ultimately no private company is going to stump up the cash for an asset they don't own and have doubts over. If the politicians believe in all the consultants they've had on this saying it will make money then they'll stump up the cash for the assets and allow an operator to run it for a fee.
Quote from: DonnyOsmond on January 22, 2025, 09:59:03 pmIf they announced it they'd save the gossiping.Announced it? Announced what?
If they announced it they'd save the gossiping.
Quote from: DonnyOsmond on January 22, 2025, 09:59:03 pmIf they announced it they'd save the gossiping.Announced it? Announced what? "Fly Doncaster" has been. It's 3 bods from Doncaster Council with zero experience of aviation or anything connected. 3 people who have as much business experience and knowledge of running companies as Angela No Brainer or the average Labour front bench. One has been a school teacher, for a short while, and then like the other two followed a career in local govt. That's it. Nothing!You'd think someone with experience would be involved, someone connected with aviation? No, this is an exercise in futility, a public relations adventure to be mentioned lots when it comes to election day. We know Doncaster Council ALONE are attempting to commit £100 million, nothing from other South Yorkshire areas ( apart from money commited to setting up "Fly Doncaster ", a council enterprise and nothing else) and zero, zilch from Central Government, no money and no proposals or direction turning the site into a thriving aviation hub. Rachel from the complaints dept is about to commit a huge amount of money to building a third runway at Heathrow though. I
BBC article today. So again the question why do you want either numpties from the council or 'sprcialists' running something that's a drain on tax ?He claimed "a lot of airlines were paid to operate out of [DSA]" under the previous ownership, adding: "Their losses were underwritten, so the taxpayer ends up funding both the cost of the operation as well as the losses incurred by the airline."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dgz71712po
Quote from: DRFC_AjA on February 01, 2025, 08:25:06 amBBC article today. So again the question why do you want either numpties from the council or 'sprcialists' running something that's a drain on tax ?He claimed "a lot of airlines were paid to operate out of [DSA]" under the previous ownership, adding: "Their losses were underwritten, so the taxpayer ends up funding both the cost of the operation as well as the losses incurred by the airline."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dgz71712poYou have to take with a pinch of salt what a rival says, it's a massive threat to LBA. Passenger flights should be part of but not the whole of the airport. There's a massive opportunity if they do get it right.Worth noting the accounts under the previous owners are totally worthless with so many things hived off, nor do they actually make much sense.
BBC article today. So again the question why do you want either numpties from the council or 'sprcialists' running something that's a drain on tax ?He claimed "a lot of airlines were paid to operate out of [DSA]" under the previous ownership, adding: "Their losses were underwritten, so the taxpayer ends up funding both the cost of the operation as well as the losses incurred by the airline."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dgz71712po
I don't get how the Ryanair guy can say Doncaster is a hard sell, yet has flights going out of Teeside! I guess they're based at LBA