0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: bobjimwilly on September 26, 2025, 12:00:41 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 10:48:26 amI feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. I’ll have to disagree there TS. At the time, there were posts on this very forum explaining why we didn’t trust the deal—hence the meetings where JR was invited to discuss it. We also held both public and private discussions with those who disagreed with us, explaining why we felt we had to oppose it. And we made a point of reminding everyone, almost daily, of the Trust’s responsibility to be so thorough.Would you care to link the to the said posts. Because as I remember it, nothing was explained, and still isn't.
Quote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 10:48:26 amI feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. I’ll have to disagree there TS. At the time, there were posts on this very forum explaining why we didn’t trust the deal—hence the meetings where JR was invited to discuss it. We also held both public and private discussions with those who disagreed with us, explaining why we felt we had to oppose it. And we made a point of reminding everyone, almost daily, of the Trust’s responsibility to be so thorough.
I feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated.
Tony. Why must you always believe there is a conspiracy? Have you read the rules by which the VSC operates? Have you no understanding of the legal processes in this country? Have you no faith in anybody at all telling the truth? Have you no memory?What you imply is downright shameful. BobG
Quote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 01:07:32 pmQuote from: bobjimwilly on September 26, 2025, 12:00:41 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 10:48:26 amI feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. I’ll have to disagree there TS. At the time, there were posts on this very forum explaining why we didn’t trust the deal—hence the meetings where JR was invited to discuss it. We also held both public and private discussions with those who disagreed with us, explaining why we felt we had to oppose it. And we made a point of reminding everyone, almost daily, of the Trust’s responsibility to be so thorough.Would you care to link the to the said posts. Because as I remember it, nothing was explained, and still isn't. Why don't you go and look for them? Then consider whether you are as informed on this as you thought you were.
Im not wasting my time searching for something that doesn't exist
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on September 26, 2025, 02:40:42 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 01:07:32 pmQuote from: bobjimwilly on September 26, 2025, 12:00:41 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 10:48:26 amI feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. I’ll have to disagree there TS. At the time, there were posts on this very forum explaining why we didn’t trust the deal—hence the meetings where JR was invited to discuss it. We also held both public and private discussions with those who disagreed with us, explaining why we felt we had to oppose it. And we made a point of reminding everyone, almost daily, of the Trust’s responsibility to be so thorough.Would you care to link the to the said posts. Because as I remember it, nothing was explained, and still isn't. Why don't you go and look for them? Then consider whether you are as informed on this as you thought you were.Im not wasting my time searching for something that doesn't exist
I feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. Still now were told there are things they still cant talk about. JR is still the best chairman and owner we've ever had, unless some of the snide insinuations against him on here are backed with proof and evidence, then that will never change.
Quote from: TonySoprano on September 27, 2025, 07:27:54 amQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on September 26, 2025, 02:40:42 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 01:07:32 pmQuote from: bobjimwilly on September 26, 2025, 12:00:41 pmQuote from: TonySoprano on September 26, 2025, 10:48:26 amI feel that if the vsc were more transparent at the time as to why they were fighting it, then some of the animosity could have been alleviated. I’ll have to disagree there TS. At the time, there were posts on this very forum explaining why we didn’t trust the deal—hence the meetings where JR was invited to discuss it. We also held both public and private discussions with those who disagreed with us, explaining why we felt we had to oppose it. And we made a point of reminding everyone, almost daily, of the Trust’s responsibility to be so thorough.Would you care to link the to the said posts. Because as I remember it, nothing was explained, and still isn't. Why don't you go and look for them? Then consider whether you are as informed on this as you thought you were.Im not wasting my time searching for something that doesn't exist You can find it in 30 seconds. You prefer to stay ignorant and certain of your own (wrong) opinions. On this as on so much else.