0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hound.There is a link on that site that says "See all updates"Try it.Then ask yourself why you always assume I'm trying to mislead people.
Hound.There is a link on that site that says "See all updates"Try it.Then ask yourself why you always assume I'm trying to mislead people.
Hound.Experience. Years of experience of you not accepting factual stuff that I post on here and rubbing your hands gleefully on the occasions that it turns out I'm mistaken. I assume you accept that you're wrong on this occasion?
Billy, 2026 is a long way off for the EU.
26 December 2020Following documents added: Trade and Cooperation Agreement
Finally:"no doubt you will be picking out stuff to whine about but will conveniently forgetting to mention the good stuff."Good line that, from someone who insists he's never accused me of arguing in bad faith.
As far as getting stuff wrong, of course I do. Everyone does. My policy is that, if I state something as a fact and I get it wrong, I do my best to correct it. Like in this very thread.It is sort of fundamental to civilised discourse.I fully accept that you may decide that you'll ignore everything anyone ever says because sometimes they get stuff wrong. Although if that's your approach, I'm wondering why you joined in this thread?
Hound.I know exactly what you said. The words are irrelevant. The implication is there in pretty much every interaction we have. I didn't say that you had every used those precise words. I said that you assume I'm acting in bad faith. So why you chose to respond in the way you did is anyone's guess. If you actually DON'T think I'm acting in bad faith, you could have said "I don't think you're acting in bad faith." In fact you could do it now.
Hound.If you clicked that link and then the obvious next one "Show all updates" and you still insist that the text of the deal was published there on 24 Dec then I'm not sure what the point is in discussing anything with you.It says in plain English, black and white text in the updatesQuote26 December 2020Following documents added: Trade and Cooperation Agreement
Pour petrol on and deny lighting the match
Quote from: Filo on December 26, 2020, 04:40:04 pmPour petrol on and deny lighting the matchHardly Filo.I made a comment but look at post number 1442 to see who lit the match.
Quote from: drfchound on December 26, 2020, 06:15:44 pmQuote from: Filo on December 26, 2020, 04:40:04 pmPour petrol on and deny lighting the matchHardly Filo.I made a comment but look at post number 1442 to see who lit the match.How do you know if that was about you?
On the gov.uk site it says it was published on 24th December.
Hound.There is a link on that site that says "See all updates"Try it.Then ask yourself why you always assume I'm trying to mislead people.
Quote from: Filo on December 26, 2020, 06:19:49 pmQuote from: drfchound on December 26, 2020, 06:15:44 pmQuote from: Filo on December 26, 2020, 04:40:04 pmPour petrol on and deny lighting the matchHardly Filo.I made a comment but look at post number 1442 to see who lit the match.How do you know if that was about you?Because it was addressed to me.
I just wondered who would feel the need to defend themselves at a random commentYou see this is exactly what we read with your posts, over and over again, wether I agree or not with BST is irrelevant, over and over again you throw in a random question/ statement, usually aimed at BST, disagree with him, thats fine, but when challenged about your disagreement you got all defensive, “ not me guv” it’s tedious and boring and I think most of us can see what your doing, I sometimes wonder why A bloke of BST’s intelligence continues to engage with people who only want to wind him or any one else up for that matter, disagree by all means, but add something to the debate