0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Belton.You are quite at liberty to:1) Ignore this discussion.2) Contribute substantively to this discussion.3) Do neither of the above but snipe at people who choose 2.Anyone taking bets?
As someone who works in the NHS all I can say is good f**king riddance
Quote from: River Don on June 26, 2021, 06:58:28 pmSo why was he not just sacked when he failed to resign?Because then people would have pointed out that the PM was calling the kettle black.
So why was he not just sacked when he failed to resign?
Post six is the first one that tells anyone to f**k off. If you think there is no provocation before that then you are being even more selective than usual. In fact, most of Sydney’s posts are provocative, including the vast majority of his thread openers.But of course our Sydney hangs on your every word, hence the lack of sniping from you to him. That’s not unexpected, but be careful about who you accuse of what, and who you don’t, because it can make you look a bit silly.
Oh thanks for not minding and giving me a choice BST, that's much appreciated. So, you think Skippy's hatred of everything British, including the royal family and the Tories - in fact, every subject in the title of his post, wasn't provocative?Give it a rest!
As for my condemnation of sniping, I very rarely do it because I assume that we are all big boys who can take as well as give. I do have a policy that I try to stick to of not initiating personal attacks. In the case of why I'm not having a pop at Sydney, well, he's never started a fight with me. If you truly think I somehow get off on him "hanging on my every word" then...well I can't think what to say that you wouldn't interpret as an insult so I'll rise above and shake my head wistfully. If you're asking why I'm pointing out BB's volley of abuse at the start of this thread then I obviously didn't make myself clear. It's not about him. I usually try to ignore him in that mode. It's more about your selective was in who's contributions you choose to criticise. I'm merely pointing out the inconsistency.
Ah, now we've got to the issue Belton. It's not toxicity that you object to. It's toxicity directed at you personally. If you'd said that months ago, it would have been much clearer.
Quote from: SydneyRover on June 26, 2021, 11:24:24 pmQuote from: Bentley Bullet on June 26, 2021, 11:22:29 pmOh thanks for not minding and giving me a choice BST, that's much appreciated. So, you think Skippy's hatred of everything British, including the royal family and the Tories - in fact, every subject in the title of his post, wasn't provocative?Give it a rest!there you go posting without a thought for the truth bb, if you do know it then that makes you a liar.And there you go again! My truth is reality, Sydney, your truth is The Guardian. There is no way I would attempt to put you right on the political scene in your life in Sydney because you would be quite within your rights to tell me to f**k off, just like I tell you to f**k off on here.
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on June 26, 2021, 11:22:29 pmOh thanks for not minding and giving me a choice BST, that's much appreciated. So, you think Skippy's hatred of everything British, including the royal family and the Tories - in fact, every subject in the title of his post, wasn't provocative?Give it a rest!there you go posting without a thought for the truth bb, if you do know it then that makes you a liar.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on June 26, 2021, 11:32:55 pmAh, now we've got to the issue Belton. It's not toxicity that you object to. It's toxicity directed at you personally. If you'd said that months ago, it would have been much clearer.I didn’t realise you were being provocatively, personally toxic.Know I know.
At least my presence seems to ween you off the Guardian, Sydney, albeit temporarily. As an aside, I don't hate you either, although I would understand you hating me. I would imagine there's now't worse than having an argument with somebody who's right (so I've been told).