Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:22:14 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Nam v TLOD  (Read 7360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

anton123

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1537
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #30 on March 05, 2022, 03:23:52 pm by anton123 »
It was a good free kick to be fair , sometimes u have to just hold your hands up



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29506
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #31 on March 05, 2022, 03:24:54 pm by drfchound »
For those who think ball possession is important, we have had 58% in our favour at this point.

Redroy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 272
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #32 on March 05, 2022, 03:25:00 pm by Redroy »
Why did the keeper leave such a massive gap

Not able to view this game today but was he stood in the centre of the goal as was recommended earlier in the season.

Nah he wasn't. Wall didn't even bother to jump

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8741
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #33 on March 05, 2022, 03:25:54 pm by Copps is Magic »
We're a shambles defensively.

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3839
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #34 on March 05, 2022, 03:26:56 pm by ScillyRover »
For those who think ball possession is important, we have had 58% in our favour at this point.
Yeah, majority of which has been passing back to Mitchell

RedRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 201
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #35 on March 05, 2022, 03:28:05 pm by RedRover »
Did he celebrate?

Why does it matter?

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2584
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #36 on March 05, 2022, 03:28:08 pm by EasyforDennis »
Can someone tell the players who stand in the wall that they are allowed to jump.

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #37 on March 05, 2022, 03:29:39 pm by RoversAlias »

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3839
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #38 on March 05, 2022, 03:29:50 pm by ScillyRover »
Refs shit as usual

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #39 on March 05, 2022, 03:29:59 pm by Lesonthewest »
Why did the keeper leave such a massive gap
Bad goalkeeping that, made it easy for May.

RedRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 201
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #40 on March 05, 2022, 03:30:31 pm by RedRover »
Can someone tell the players who stand in the wall that they are allowed to jump.

Then when they jump and a player puts one under them and scores know doubt you'll be on here with another pearl of wisdom. Can someone tell the players they don't have to jump!

monkeytennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 472
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #41 on March 05, 2022, 03:31:48 pm by monkeytennis »
Can someone tell the players who stand in the wall that they are allowed to jump.

Then when they jump and a player puts one under them and scores know doubt you'll be on here with another pearl of wisdom. Can someone tell the players they don't have to jump!

You leave one player lying on the floor god its like you dont even watch footy

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #42 on March 05, 2022, 03:32:53 pm by IDM »
And if it hits the prone player on the arm it’s probably a penalty..

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #43 on March 05, 2022, 03:36:11 pm by RoversAlias »
Gillingham, Morecambe and Wimbledon are all losing as it stands. Silver linings and all that.

glosterred

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8891
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #44 on March 05, 2022, 03:36:44 pm by glosterred »
This ref seems a bit card happy, might not be 11 v 11 if he keeps this up


COYR

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #45 on March 05, 2022, 03:37:13 pm by IDM »
Someone tell the players the other scores at half time.?  Give them a bit of a boot.?

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7805
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #46 on March 05, 2022, 03:37:45 pm by scawsby steve »
Gillingham, Morecambe and Wimbledon are all losing as it stands. Silver linings and all that.

Crewe as well.

Donny Dub

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 755
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #47 on March 05, 2022, 03:37:51 pm by Donny Dub »
The iFollow commentators are so irritating.  I hope we quickly equalise to shut them up before I watch in silence.

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8741
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #48 on March 05, 2022, 03:38:15 pm by Copps is Magic »
37 minutes in we've not threatened their goal.

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8741
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #49 on March 05, 2022, 03:38:56 pm by Copps is Magic »
I'll make a second bold prediction. We won't start playing until 60 minutes.

Barmby Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4469
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #50 on March 05, 2022, 03:39:01 pm by Barmby Rover »
2-0 game over

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3839
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #51 on March 05, 2022, 03:39:20 pm by ScillyRover »
2-0

Jersey Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 375
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #52 on March 05, 2022, 03:39:35 pm by Jersey Rover »
Typical GM set up. 1 up front toothless. Usual change at half time when we’re losing to 442 shape and we will play better

Wiltshire Exile

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2901
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #53 on March 05, 2022, 03:39:42 pm by Wiltshire Exile »
37 minutes in we've not threatened their goal.

Some things never change!

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #54 on March 05, 2022, 03:39:56 pm by IDM »
2-0 game over

Why.? Was it game over last week.?

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #55 on March 05, 2022, 03:40:03 pm by bpoolrover »
Pathetic

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3839
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #56 on March 05, 2022, 03:40:16 pm by ScillyRover »
We’ve been dreadful defensively and offered next to nothing going forward

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8741
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #57 on March 05, 2022, 03:40:40 pm by Copps is Magic »
Terrible defending again from our two fullbacks. First to let them get the cross in, second for the uncontested header at the back post.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11168
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #58 on March 05, 2022, 03:40:48 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Any hope we had has now gone.

Redroy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 272
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #59 on March 05, 2022, 03:41:14 pm by Redroy »
Abysmal.

Quite enjoying watching Cheltenham though.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012