0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: dickos1 on July 19, 2018, 01:47:11 pmQuote from: selby on July 19, 2018, 10:01:10 am The first season he oversaw the worst change in fortune I have seen at this club. his change of tactics, his change of our attacking personal and his continual ignoring of certain players at his disposal cost us relegation. In his second season he blew a championship season in the last seven games, when persisting with picking the player on loan from Everton, Mason, and Alcock who were all completely out of form, and in Alcock's case not even match fit, and his substitutions at Hartlepool when all we needed a result, not only changed 3 players, but went through a load of positional changes completely losing our shape. And again had it in publicly with certain players who were ignored. Last season leaving players out again, being reluctant to play Baudry when available, playing players in positions they struggle with, man management, persisting with a goalkeeper 6 ft 4ins who did not come off his line, costing us points. He was a great club organiser, shook the system up on the playing side from top to bottom, made many improvements at the club behind the scenes, as a team manager it is my opinion only of course, but I think he was pretty average, as a man manager again average. Of course some would respond to him, but having talked to a couple of parents of some of our younger players, he could be soul destroying, and not the person he portrayed publicly lets say. He had had his time here, I thank him for a promotion, for his determination to shake the club up in the background, but we should not have had to come back from relegation, and his resignation came when for the first time in three seasons he felt slighted by the board with regard to finance, the tail cannot be seen to shake the dog, so time to go. The question that should be asked about the budget is, did we give him too much money for the return from his efforts compared to managers at say Rochdale, Shrewsbury, Exeter, Accrington in the time he was here? and was it a sign of petulance or even resignation he could not work without being able to splash the cash?He oversaw two massive changes in fortune in his first season, as he took a side in the relegation zone upto the top 10 and then he took them from the top 10 back to the relegation zone. Aye, he took them back into the relegation zone after taking them well out of it. And if you recall you called for him to be sacked, as well.
Quote from: selby on July 19, 2018, 10:01:10 am The first season he oversaw the worst change in fortune I have seen at this club. his change of tactics, his change of our attacking personal and his continual ignoring of certain players at his disposal cost us relegation. In his second season he blew a championship season in the last seven games, when persisting with picking the player on loan from Everton, Mason, and Alcock who were all completely out of form, and in Alcock's case not even match fit, and his substitutions at Hartlepool when all we needed a result, not only changed 3 players, but went through a load of positional changes completely losing our shape. And again had it in publicly with certain players who were ignored. Last season leaving players out again, being reluctant to play Baudry when available, playing players in positions they struggle with, man management, persisting with a goalkeeper 6 ft 4ins who did not come off his line, costing us points. He was a great club organiser, shook the system up on the playing side from top to bottom, made many improvements at the club behind the scenes, as a team manager it is my opinion only of course, but I think he was pretty average, as a man manager again average. Of course some would respond to him, but having talked to a couple of parents of some of our younger players, he could be soul destroying, and not the person he portrayed publicly lets say. He had had his time here, I thank him for a promotion, for his determination to shake the club up in the background, but we should not have had to come back from relegation, and his resignation came when for the first time in three seasons he felt slighted by the board with regard to finance, the tail cannot be seen to shake the dog, so time to go. The question that should be asked about the budget is, did we give him too much money for the return from his efforts compared to managers at say Rochdale, Shrewsbury, Exeter, Accrington in the time he was here? and was it a sign of petulance or even resignation he could not work without being able to splash the cash?He oversaw two massive changes in fortune in his first season, as he took a side in the relegation zone upto the top 10 and then he took them from the top 10 back to the relegation zone.
The first season he oversaw the worst change in fortune I have seen at this club. his change of tactics, his change of our attacking personal and his continual ignoring of certain players at his disposal cost us relegation. In his second season he blew a championship season in the last seven games, when persisting with picking the player on loan from Everton, Mason, and Alcock who were all completely out of form, and in Alcock's case not even match fit, and his substitutions at Hartlepool when all we needed a result, not only changed 3 players, but went through a load of positional changes completely losing our shape. And again had it in publicly with certain players who were ignored. Last season leaving players out again, being reluctant to play Baudry when available, playing players in positions they struggle with, man management, persisting with a goalkeeper 6 ft 4ins who did not come off his line, costing us points. He was a great club organiser, shook the system up on the playing side from top to bottom, made many improvements at the club behind the scenes, as a team manager it is my opinion only of course, but I think he was pretty average, as a man manager again average. Of course some would respond to him, but having talked to a couple of parents of some of our younger players, he could be soul destroying, and not the person he portrayed publicly lets say. He had had his time here, I thank him for a promotion, for his determination to shake the club up in the background, but we should not have had to come back from relegation, and his resignation came when for the first time in three seasons he felt slighted by the board with regard to finance, the tail cannot be seen to shake the dog, so time to go. The question that should be asked about the budget is, did we give him too much money for the return from his efforts compared to managers at say Rochdale, Shrewsbury, Exeter, Accrington in the time he was here? and was it a sign of petulance or even resignation he could not work without being able to splash the cash?
So you honestly think if we got 1.5 million + that we would spend the majority on players get a grip
Quote from: RedJ on July 19, 2018, 03:11:27 pmQuote from: dickos1 on July 19, 2018, 01:47:11 pmQuote from: selby on July 19, 2018, 10:01:10 am The first season he oversaw the worst change in fortune I have seen at this club. his change of tactics, his change of our attacking personal and his continual ignoring of certain players at his disposal cost us relegation. In his second season he blew a championship season in the last seven games, when persisting with picking the player on loan from Everton, Mason, and Alcock who were all completely out of form, and in Alcock's case not even match fit, and his substitutions at Hartlepool when all we needed a result, not only changed 3 players, but went through a load of positional changes completely losing our shape. And again had it in publicly with certain players who were ignored. Last season leaving players out again, being reluctant to play Baudry when available, playing players in positions they struggle with, man management, persisting with a goalkeeper 6 ft 4ins who did not come off his line, costing us points. He was a great club organiser, shook the system up on the playing side from top to bottom, made many improvements at the club behind the scenes, as a team manager it is my opinion only of course, but I think he was pretty average, as a man manager again average. Of course some would respond to him, but having talked to a couple of parents of some of our younger players, he could be soul destroying, and not the person he portrayed publicly lets say. He had had his time here, I thank him for a promotion, for his determination to shake the club up in the background, but we should not have had to come back from relegation, and his resignation came when for the first time in three seasons he felt slighted by the board with regard to finance, the tail cannot be seen to shake the dog, so time to go. The question that should be asked about the budget is, did we give him too much money for the return from his efforts compared to managers at say Rochdale, Shrewsbury, Exeter, Accrington in the time he was here? and was it a sign of petulance or even resignation he could not work without being able to splash the cash?He oversaw two massive changes in fortune in his first season, as he took a side in the relegation zone upto the top 10 and then he took them from the top 10 back to the relegation zone. Aye, he took them back into the relegation zone after taking them well out of it. And if you recall you called for him to be sacked, as well.I’ve just said that 🙄And don’t just follow everything your mate says, I never called for him to be sacked at all. I was asked if we didn’t get any points from the Easter games should he be sacked and I said yes.Not really calling for him to be sacked is it
One things for sure if marquis does get sold they won’t free much up for McCann to spend on the squad
Quote from: Danmckay456 on July 19, 2018, 06:41:03 pmOne things for sure if marquis does get sold they won’t free much up for McCann to spend on the squad Are you the new Director of Finance?
Quote from: Filo on July 20, 2018, 07:52:16 amQuote from: Danmckay456 on July 19, 2018, 06:41:03 pmOne things for sure if marquis does get sold they won’t free much up for McCann to spend on the squad Are you the new Director of Finance?Are you the new Public Relations Director 😏
And now it looks like he might be looking for def mid, according to Liam Holden, but won't be held to ransome
Quote from: ravenrover on July 22, 2018, 09:25:29 pmAnd now it looks like he might be looking for def mid, according to Liam Holden, but won't be held to ransomeIs this the same Liam Hoden whose article people held up as proving there was going to be no more transfer activity?
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on July 23, 2018, 11:30:45 amQuote from: ravenrover on July 22, 2018, 09:25:29 pmAnd now it looks like he might be looking for def mid, according to Liam Holden, but won't be held to ransomeIs this the same Liam Hoden whose article people held up as proving there was going to be no more transfer activity?He can only report what he's told...