0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't think BRR likes being analysed RD.His/her mission in life is to peddle Putin guff but when you challenge him/her on these matters there is plenty of evasion and no substance.
Quote from: wilts rover on September 01, 2023, 08:17:41 pmQuote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 31, 2023, 10:27:06 pmQuote from: wilts rover on August 31, 2023, 08:53:18 pmQuote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 27, 2023, 06:55:22 pmQuote from: i_ateallthepies on August 27, 2023, 04:48:24 pmQuote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?Are you agreeing with what I said with BST?I'm always interested in all angles, and have been stating the ones that tend not to be on the side of the one sided western media narrative for balance.As a very obvious example, many here referred to Russia running out of ammo from the early days, over a year ago, as per the Western media narrative/propaganda - that hasn't happened has it? Indeed Ukraine's lack of ammo is more of an issue. Resupplies for Ukraine are cited, but not the crucial detail of them being mainly in the distant future. One reason why the US has escalated things with supplying from its stocks of cluster shells - there wasn't an alternative. For balance I provide one side of an argument.Hmmmm....I referred to one sode where it was said Russia would run out of shells, missiles etc a year ago (or so), and the obvious is that they haven't. What point are you making?See also the post re Forbes - I gave the link to tanks destroyed etc. Make your own conclusion, including whether or not Forbes is promoting a misleading pro western perspective or not.The point I am making is that you are not providing balance in your posts - despite you saying you are providing balance in your posts.Balance in the discusson here.
Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 31, 2023, 10:27:06 pmQuote from: wilts rover on August 31, 2023, 08:53:18 pmQuote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 27, 2023, 06:55:22 pmQuote from: i_ateallthepies on August 27, 2023, 04:48:24 pmQuote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?Are you agreeing with what I said with BST?I'm always interested in all angles, and have been stating the ones that tend not to be on the side of the one sided western media narrative for balance.As a very obvious example, many here referred to Russia running out of ammo from the early days, over a year ago, as per the Western media narrative/propaganda - that hasn't happened has it? Indeed Ukraine's lack of ammo is more of an issue. Resupplies for Ukraine are cited, but not the crucial detail of them being mainly in the distant future. One reason why the US has escalated things with supplying from its stocks of cluster shells - there wasn't an alternative. For balance I provide one side of an argument.Hmmmm....I referred to one sode where it was said Russia would run out of shells, missiles etc a year ago (or so), and the obvious is that they haven't. What point are you making?See also the post re Forbes - I gave the link to tanks destroyed etc. Make your own conclusion, including whether or not Forbes is promoting a misleading pro western perspective or not.The point I am making is that you are not providing balance in your posts - despite you saying you are providing balance in your posts.
Quote from: wilts rover on August 31, 2023, 08:53:18 pmQuote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 27, 2023, 06:55:22 pmQuote from: i_ateallthepies on August 27, 2023, 04:48:24 pmQuote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?Are you agreeing with what I said with BST?I'm always interested in all angles, and have been stating the ones that tend not to be on the side of the one sided western media narrative for balance.As a very obvious example, many here referred to Russia running out of ammo from the early days, over a year ago, as per the Western media narrative/propaganda - that hasn't happened has it? Indeed Ukraine's lack of ammo is more of an issue. Resupplies for Ukraine are cited, but not the crucial detail of them being mainly in the distant future. One reason why the US has escalated things with supplying from its stocks of cluster shells - there wasn't an alternative. For balance I provide one side of an argument.Hmmmm....I referred to one sode where it was said Russia would run out of shells, missiles etc a year ago (or so), and the obvious is that they haven't. What point are you making?See also the post re Forbes - I gave the link to tanks destroyed etc. Make your own conclusion, including whether or not Forbes is promoting a misleading pro western perspective or not.
Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on August 27, 2023, 06:55:22 pmQuote from: i_ateallthepies on August 27, 2023, 04:48:24 pmQuote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?Are you agreeing with what I said with BST?I'm always interested in all angles, and have been stating the ones that tend not to be on the side of the one sided western media narrative for balance.As a very obvious example, many here referred to Russia running out of ammo from the early days, over a year ago, as per the Western media narrative/propaganda - that hasn't happened has it? Indeed Ukraine's lack of ammo is more of an issue. Resupplies for Ukraine are cited, but not the crucial detail of them being mainly in the distant future. One reason why the US has escalated things with supplying from its stocks of cluster shells - there wasn't an alternative. For balance I provide one side of an argument.Hmmmm....
Quote from: i_ateallthepies on August 27, 2023, 04:48:24 pmQuote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?Are you agreeing with what I said with BST?I'm always interested in all angles, and have been stating the ones that tend not to be on the side of the one sided western media narrative for balance.As a very obvious example, many here referred to Russia running out of ammo from the early days, over a year ago, as per the Western media narrative/propaganda - that hasn't happened has it? Indeed Ukraine's lack of ammo is more of an issue. Resupplies for Ukraine are cited, but not the crucial detail of them being mainly in the distant future. One reason why the US has escalated things with supplying from its stocks of cluster shells - there wasn't an alternative.
Quote: "someone who conveniently takes one side of an argument, sticks religiously to it, and ignores anything contrary to his dictate"Can you think of any other frequent poster on this thread BRR, who does the above?
Yet you criticise other people for giving the opposite view to you? Surely now you should be asking everyone to give the opposite view to you? For balance.
Quote from: BessieBlue on September 03, 2023, 08:56:26 pmI don't think BRR likes being analysed RD.His/her mission in life is to peddle Putin guff but when you challenge him/her on these matters there is plenty of evasion and no substance. Oh but I love analysis! So if you have something to say, do be specific rather than vague with no substance.And on that, in analysis it's well known that what you say in a reactive situation is mostly about your own issues, as you demonstrate it seems?
First dead Challenger report - could well be more. Next up Russians will capture one.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTZdc37qZig
Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on September 05, 2023, 03:54:46 pmFirst dead Challenger report - could well be more. Next up Russians will capture one.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTZdc37qZigAnd the crew survived.
Which is entirely the aim with Western armoured vehicles. You can replace platforms far more easily than you can replace trained crew. The Russian tanks by contrast have been awful at protecting crew. And many, many, many times more of them than Ukraine ones have been destroyed.You'd think BRR would comment on that, given his commitment to the truth.
I have never heard anybody claim that the Challenger 2 was invincible, but it does seem to be the best tank in the world. It’s a pity we stopped making them , there’s a market out there,
Great leader, Putin is, no?https://twitter.com/irgarner/status/1699083248083636489Quiz question. Which other psychologically fragile, low grade thug took over a shattered empire and told them stories about Jews being to blame?
"So far for maybe 50k losses of troops, and a huge loss of armour"Is this evidence, BRR or just your perverted wishful thinking?
Have you noticed? When Russia first started chucking missiles into civilian areas, their useful idiots like BRR immediately jumped in and spewed out the Kremlin line that it was a precision attack on a NATO munitions dump. Like a ventriloquist dummy with Putin's hand up their arse.Now, everyone is so brutalised and numbed by what Russia does on a daily basis that the useful idiots don't have the energy to keep jumping in with their lines.This was today. https://twitter.com/JimmySecUK/status/1699403565419155738
So, facts aren't remotely important to you. Just your twisted wishlist.
https://www.minusrus.com/en?__cf_chl_tk=YJhP7Wlif36HSzGsUQIuLw06l2uWZQE3ADfxDqESZu0-1677656834-0-gaNycGzNCvs
Quote from: Not Now Kato on September 07, 2023, 09:49:53 pmhttps://www.minusrus.com/en?__cf_chl_tk=YJhP7Wlif36HSzGsUQIuLw06l2uWZQE3ADfxDqESZu0-1677656834-0-gaNycGzNCvsMore Russian manpower, tank, artillery losses than they have. Interesting.