Baroness Jones

[belton rover]

Have you seen it, Sydney? Can you pop a link on here?

[SydneyRover]

still not answer then?

[SydneyRover]

pretend for a moment you're back in school, someone makes a comment and the other person answers or when asked they say 'I don't know' or similar.

[belton rover]

I’ve answered you clearly.
Please explain where you think I haven’t.
Then maybe answer my question. Or don’t, as usual when you realise you have made another monumental error.

[SydneyRover]

Stop making excuses for poorly trained and controlled police belton if you took a swing at them whether it connected or not it's threateninig behaviour.

this was my comment to yours, please rer-ead all the comments since to see if you made an answer that addressed my concern.

[belton rover]

Well, I found it a bit difficult to work out where one of your points ended and the other one started, but, reading between the lack of punctuation, I believe I replied in full in the very next post.

I know you asked me to imagine I was back at school, but did you ever go?

[SydneyRover]

it's quite simple belto just address my comment above then we could possibly progress but if you want to discuss semantics I'll can ask bb to join us

[belton rover]

Okay
1. Macho says he has seen footage of Police (or Pigs, as he likes them to be known collectively) swinging punches at women who were stanting still and sitting down.

2. I ask if any of these ‘swings’ connected.

3. You wrongly assumed I meant it was okay to swing and miss, and said it was threatening behaviour.

4. I replied by saying it wasn’t okay for police to take swings and added it would be disgraceful if they had.

5. You started talking gibberish.

I was asking Macho as I hadn’t seen this damning evidence.

Edit: semantics! Try and have a thought for yourself, Sydney. Thinking is so important.
Billy won’t always be here to use his big words.

[SydneyRover]

Okay
1. Macho says he has seen footage of Police (or Pigs, as he likes them to be known collectively) swinging punches at women who were stanting still and sitting down.

2. I ask if any of these ‘swings’ connected.

3. You wrongly assumed I meant it was okay to swing and miss, and said it was threatening behaviour.

4. I replied by saying it wasn’t okay for police to take swings and added it would be disgraceful if they had.

5. You started talking gibberish.

I was asking Macho as I hadn’t seen this damning evidence.

As we are down to semantics ......................

points 1 & 2 you both agree that swings were made?

point 3 incorrect assumtion.

4 whatever

5 you don't want to discuss the point I made ever so you start diversions and wind ups

[belton rover]

I haven’t seen the f**king footage! How can I agree that punches were swung!

[SydneyRover]

go and play you silly games with someone that gives a shit

[belton rover]

I’ll tell you what Sydney. You rewrite any comments or questions so they make sense, and I might have another go.

If it’s the bit that includes ‘making excuses’, then I have made it crystal clear that I am not.

But, as I said, if that’s not what you are looking for, then you’ll have to be clearer.
By clearer, I mean understandable.

[drfchound]

I’ll tell you what Sydney. You rewrite any comments or questions so they make sense, and I might have another go.

If it’s the bit that includes ‘making excuses’, then I have made it crystal clear that I am not.

But, as I said, if that’s not what you are looking for, then you’ll have to be clearer.
By clearer, I mean understandable.

Belton, I think the last part of your post is what Sydney is going to have difficulty with.

[SydneyRover]

From someone with 20000 post but can't reply in the correct place that's really something hound

[drfchound]

LoL.
You have a problem writing in the right place despite knowing that I leave a gap between the post I quote on and writing my response and then blame it on me.
You are so funny.

[SydneyRover]

I suppose you could go on the football forum and have a cry 

[drfchound]

Not when you make me laugh so much on here.

[SydneyRover]

Not when you make me laugh so much on here.

 

[bpoolrover]

Not when you make me laugh so much on here.

some nice people on this forum at times hound don’t know why you bother

[Ldr]

If you choose to step outside the law, don't cry when you face consequences. Under current legislation (not saying I agree with as I don't) the gathering was illegal. They knew it, they went ahead, stop whinging

[SydneyRover]

Maybe women have had enough being treated as second class citizens in their own country and being abused, raped and killed by men, just sayin'

[Ldr]

Maybe women have had enough being treated as second class citizens in their own country and being abused, raped and killed by men, just sayin'

I dont doubt it, my opinion stays the same. Break the law, suffer the consequences

[SydneyRover]

It took a long time for men to get full emancipation if men stood by women and gave them equal rights and protections maybe they wouldn't feel their only recourse is to try to be heard and break the law to do it.

You are now benefitting from those that lost suffered and lost their lives in the past to get the vote it's time more men accepted responsibility and help get wonem those same benefits.

[SydneyRover]

BBC

''PMQs: Nichols and Johnson on violence towards women

PMQs: Nichols and Johnson on violence towards women
Close
The prime minister was asked how women were “meant to get justice” when a rape review remained unpublished two years after it was promised.

Labour’s Charlotte Nichols highlighted how, as a MP, she could use Parliamentary privilege to “name the men who have hurt me”.

Boris Johnson said the “fundamental issue” was to address casual sexism and “apathy that fails to address the concerns of women”.''

Johnson is right for once ....................... so why is the report by his government 'sitting on a 'shelf' with other reports he doesn't like reading.

[SydneyRover]

''Priti Patel wanted police to stop people gathering at Sarah Everard vigil''

''Exclusive: some police chiefs feel ‘hung out to dry’ as memo reveals home secretary’s enforcement call''

What a piece of work Patel is, urges police to act then pulls the rug out when it goes sour. Maybe it's time the bar was raised for entry into the police force too.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/19/priti-patel-wanted-police-stop-people-gathering-sarah-everard-vigil

[wilts rover]

If you choose to step outside the law, don't cry when you face consequences. Under current legislation (not saying I agree with as I don't) the gathering was illegal. They knew it, they went ahead, stop whinging

Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge was in attendence - and not wearing a mask. Are you saying our future Queen broke the law? If so what punishment should she receive?

[wilts rover]

10 years in jail if you attack a statue.

£500 fine, a night time curfew and you get to keep your job if you are a policeman and attack a lone woman you don't know in the street:

https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1372964818542542850

[ravenrover]

If you choose to step outside the law, don't cry when you face consequences. Under current legislation (not saying I agree with as I don't) the gathering was illegal. They knew it, they went ahead, stop whinging

Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge was in attendence - and not wearing a mask. Are you saying our future Queen broke the law? If so what punishment should she receive?

At what part of the "vigil" did she attend? The only picture of her I saw she was thete in daylight. How many others were there at that time? Was it peacefull? Not against the law to not wear a mask in the open air. I doubt very much any of the public were allowed within 10m of her never mind 2. Perhaps she interpreted the meaning of vigil correctly

[drfchound]

10 years in jail if you attack a statue.

£500 fine, a night time curfew and you get to keep your job if you are a policeman and attack a lone woman you don't know in the street:

https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1372964818542542850

I’m not sure he will keep his job wilts.
He will probably lose his job when the case is heard.

[SydneyRover]

Here's some fotage of the incident

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/19/west-midlands-police-officer-attacked-woman-pc-oliver-banfield

police reluctant to investigate their own yet again.