0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The write ups in magazines and by motoring correspondents seem to be edging more and more to the development of Hydrogen, and it seems to be getting a bigger toe hold in the rush for development route.
Quote from: selby on January 05, 2022, 11:25:21 am The write ups in magazines and by motoring correspondents seem to be edging more and more to the development of Hydrogen, and it seems to be getting a bigger toe hold in the rush for development route.Exactly the opposite of what is happening.Most manufacturers have moved away from fuel cells as a primary technology for cars, only Toyota and Hyundai keep a vehicle on the market, at very low sales volumes.VW set out the reasons for choosing batteries over hydrogen;https://chargedevs.com/newswire/volkswagen-explains-why-batteries-not-fuel-cells-are-the-right-choice-for-passenger-cars/Hydrogen from green sources has a role to play, but not in fuel for cars.Lorries and rail have a better case.
Any political Party that puts in their next election manifesto we are not going green or woke get in.
Selby,Your link just backs up what I am saying.Hydrogen is nowhere near production ready, and the green hydrogen supply chains are not in place.At 44% efficiency, as the article claims, that is way below the efficiency levels from batteries, which is also rising year on year.In terms of costs, hydrogen is MUCH more expensive than electricity at current prices, so the cost per km to users would be far higher, even if the refuelling infrastructure was in place (it is not, at the moment).I think you are confusing long term research interest with near market production capability.Even Toyota and Hyundai have moved into the electric vehicle space as a corporate priority;https://www.ft.com/content/4e940aef-4513-462f-891b-2592d3e2ffc1
Quote from: albie on January 07, 2022, 05:40:26 pmSelby,Your link just backs up what I am saying.Hydrogen is nowhere near production ready, and the green hydrogen supply chains are not in place.At 44% efficiency, as the article claims, that is way below the efficiency levels from batteries, which is also rising year on year.In terms of costs, hydrogen is MUCH more expensive than electricity at current prices, so the cost per km to users would be far higher, even if the refuelling infrastructure was in place (it is not, at the moment).I think you are confusing long term research interest with near market production capability.Even Toyota and Hyundai have moved into the electric vehicle space as a corporate priority;https://www.ft.com/content/4e940aef-4513-462f-891b-2592d3e2ffc1Do we know how much it costs to charge an electric car with enough juice to drive say 350 miles (if that's possible)? I know some of the claimed EV ranges are quite optimistic.
Quote from: Axholme Lion on January 10, 2022, 10:48:01 amQuote from: albie on January 07, 2022, 05:40:26 pmSelby,Your link just backs up what I am saying.Hydrogen is nowhere near production ready, and the green hydrogen supply chains are not in place.At 44% efficiency, as the article claims, that is way below the efficiency levels from batteries, which is also rising year on year.In terms of costs, hydrogen is MUCH more expensive than electricity at current prices, so the cost per km to users would be far higher, even if the refuelling infrastructure was in place (it is not, at the moment).I think you are confusing long term research interest with near market production capability.Even Toyota and Hyundai have moved into the electric vehicle space as a corporate priority;https://www.ft.com/content/4e940aef-4513-462f-891b-2592d3e2ffc1Do we know how much it costs to charge an electric car with enough juice to drive say 350 miles (if that's possible)? I know some of the claimed EV ranges are quite optimistic.Depends on the price you pay. If you have an ev suitable tarrif it could be as low as £5-6. On a normal tarrif like mine you're looking at around £20. I get 30 miles typically from a £1.50 charge.
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on January 10, 2022, 01:03:05 pmQuote from: Axholme Lion on January 10, 2022, 10:48:01 amQuote from: albie on January 07, 2022, 05:40:26 pmSelby,Your link just backs up what I am saying.Hydrogen is nowhere near production ready, and the green hydrogen supply chains are not in place.At 44% efficiency, as the article claims, that is way below the efficiency levels from batteries, which is also rising year on year.In terms of costs, hydrogen is MUCH more expensive than electricity at current prices, so the cost per km to users would be far higher, even if the refuelling infrastructure was in place (it is not, at the moment).I think you are confusing long term research interest with near market production capability.Even Toyota and Hyundai have moved into the electric vehicle space as a corporate priority;https://www.ft.com/content/4e940aef-4513-462f-891b-2592d3e2ffc1Do we know how much it costs to charge an electric car with enough juice to drive say 350 miles (if that's possible)? I know some of the claimed EV ranges are quite optimistic.Depends on the price you pay. If you have an ev suitable tarrif it could be as low as £5-6. On a normal tarrif like mine you're looking at around £20. I get 30 miles typically from a £1.50 charge.If you get 30 miles from a £1.50 charge, then 350 miles would actually cost you £17.50.......... I've just saved you £2.50 in a blink
I also don’t fancy leasing a car.I buy mine outright at the beginning and like to make the decision myself when to change it, usually about five or six years.
Not for me i think. I like to buy a car outright and keep it for a good few years. I don't like the idea of paying for something i will never own. To me PCP and leasing are just scams. I suppose if you feel the need for constantly updating your motor it's a good idea, but i don't. My Subaru has just had it's fifth year service and the garage told me it's like a brand new car, so it makes sense to me to keep it at no cost other than maintenance for a few years. i would probably get another petrol car just before the ban comes in and that should see me off. It must be more friendly to the environment to do this rather than getting a new car on a lease every three years.
Quote from: Axholme Lion on January 11, 2022, 08:52:49 amNot for me i think. I like to buy a car outright and keep it for a good few years. I don't like the idea of paying for something i will never own. To me PCP and leasing are just scams. I suppose if you feel the need for constantly updating your motor it's a good idea, but i don't. My Subaru has just had it's fifth year service and the garage told me it's like a brand new car, so it makes sense to me to keep it at no cost other than maintenance for a few years. i would probably get another petrol car just before the ban comes in and that should see me off. It must be more friendly to the environment to do this rather than getting a new car on a lease every three years. Depends on the terms doesn't it? I take my company car option as opposed to the money. I wouldn't get much of a car for the amount I sacrifice and don't have to maintain it, insure it or tax it. That works great for my main car, but I do own my other car outright, I think that's a good balance.